SEARCH  WEBSITE

REAL REVIEWS Long-term reviews of budget photo & video gear. KIT PLAN RECOMMENDATION: MINIMAL KIT Zoom F2 This image is 100% REAL, and no A.I. (or Photoshop compositing) were used to make it, and I know because I took it myself. Quality? LIGHT USE OK Yes MEDIUM USE OK ? HEAVY USE OK ? Portable? POCKET Yes CAMERA BAG Yes BACKPACK Yes Affordable? AVERAGE NEW PRICE $ 179.99 *Indicates SALE price. Amazon AFFILIATE LINK AVERAGE USED PRICE $ 100.69** **Indicates BUY NOW price. Ebay AFFILIATE LINK Common? ON AMAZON Yes ON EBAY Yes Easy To Use? SKILL LEVEL EASY NOTE: This review was duplicated from the Zoom F2-BT review...The main difference is that you cannot control this version with the mobile app, which means you cannot quickly set the LOWCUT, which I think is essential for certain mics. OVERVIEW: This is the Zoom F2, the first 32-bit float lavalier/body pack recorder from Zoom. It records in MONO (wish it was STEREO) and records to a Micro SD card, runs on two (2) AAA batteries. It's really, really small, and I use it not only for LAV mics, but also for mini (3.5mm) shotguns. The first thing I should say about this recorder, is that even though it records a 32-bit float file, it does NOT use dual A/D converters (like the Zoom F3 or F6) that make “clipping” almost never occur. Having said this, I've still got a few experiments to try because I believe this thing could have a real impact on my audio workflow… MAIN POINTS: PART 1: IS IT PORTABLE? PART 2: IS IT AFFORDABLE? PART 3: IS IT COMMON? PART 4: HOW’S THE QUALITY? PART 5: IS IT EASY TO USE? PART 6: NEEDS ADD-ONS? PART 7: WHERE DO I BUY? PART 1: IS IT PORTABLE? The Zoom F2 audio recorder is so small (by itself) that it can fit in the tiniest of pockets…in your pants, shirt, or anything. If you include the LAV mic and my favorite furry windscreen (the Comica CVM-MF1) it’s still small but may need a plastic sandwich bag to keep it all safe and together (and sealed from weather). I don’t always use the Zoom F2 with a LAV though, but often with a mini (3.5mm) shotgun mic, and the Comica CVM-VM20 has been its favorite match in this regard. PART 2: IS IT AFFORDABLE? This is a difficult question to answer, as the non-Bluetooth version is, at only $159 US, but it seems I NEED the Bluetooth version (to quickly enable or disable the REC. LOWCUT). The low-cut filter on the recorder (REC. LOWCUT) may not SEEM like it's important, but to get some of the mics I use to capture clean, REAL-sounding audio, I really like using the lowcut. It's always a combination of the mic design, wind protection, "proximity" and therefore the resultant sound quality that affect these decisions...and this has led me to conclude I personally do want the Bluetooth version, which is around $229 new. PART 3: IS IT COMMON? When I say “common” I typically mean it’s easy to find one on the used market (locally it’s OfferUp, Craigslist) and so far, I haven’t seen many of these available. That could be a good thing, assuming most who buy it aren’t getting rid of it (I wouldn’t, it’s just so handy) but we’ll see if more hit the used market after a number of years go by. PART 4: HOW’S THE QUALITY? I’ll start with durability then move to the output. The durability is okay, but I'm guessing one of the little flaps or battery doors is going to fall off at some point...strange enough this was the case with my Zoom F1 (and a totally different design). The OUTPUT (sound quality) is certainly useable. It's not as full-sounding as the Zoom F1 (which has a bit too much BASS stock) but the files are a good, or should I say great starting point, because of the 32-bit float properties. So, it will need EQ to sound more realistic, but that depends on the mic used (and the included Zoom LMF-2 lavalier mic, plus my favorite furry windscreen, the Comica CVM-MF1 can sound pretty good). I also use it with a mini shotgun mic (the Comica CVM-VM20) and it can do so many tricks it's amazing. That combination is so amazing that it convinced me the Zoom F2 is far more than a LAV mic recorder. What I do is set the gain on the CVM-VM20 mic to 1 at 1 foot, 2 at 2 feet, 3 at 3 feet and 4 at 4 feet, for the cleanest file. Yes, it does matter where you set the gain on the mic...even though the Zoom F2 is a 32-bit float recorder. For more information, check out my custom settings for the Zoom F2 + Comica CVM-VM20 (in the AUDIO database on my website). PART 5: IS IT EASY TO USE? Yes, it's really easy to use (all you have to do is position the microphone correctly, and make sure it has wind protection...a FURRY windscreen OUTDOORS). PART 6: NEEDS ADD-ONS? I think it needs a FURRY windscreen, especially if you're using it outdoors, and you'll need a micro SD card (check the manual for the card specifications). PART 7: WHERE DO I BUY? When it’s possible, and when the price is good enough, I like to buy AUDIO gear at Sweetwater. The main reason is their extended warranty (and ability to get in touch with the manufacturer quickly, which has come in handy, especially with Zoom). RECOMMENDATION: I consider the Zoom F2-BT to be one of my most valuable pieces in the AUDIO category of my kit, as it works well as not only a LAV mic, but also as a tiny companion for mini (3.5mm) shotgun mics as well, especially my Comica CVM-VM20. These reviews are just my opinion and are focused on my Q.P.A.C.E. packing method, so they're not comprehensive. I wrote these mostly to help me remember what items worked for my KIT PLANS (and which didn't). If I said anything negative I apologize, as these products still may work well for you in your situation, but they were not Q.P.A.C.E (Quality, Portable, Affordable, Common, Easy-to-Use) enough for my budget filmmaking KIT PLANS .

REAL REVIEWS Long-term reviews of budget photo & video gear. KIT PLAN RECOMMENDATION: BASIC KIT ULANZI MT-44 This image is 100% REAL, and no A.I. (or Photoshop compositing) were used to make it, and I know because I took it myself. Quality? LIGHT USE OK Yes MEDIUM USE OK Yes HEAVY USE OK ? Portable? POCKET No CAMERA BAG No BACKPACK Yes Affordable? AVERAGE NEW PRICE $ 24.65 *Indicates SALE price. Amazon AFFILIATE LINK AVERAGE USED PRICE N/A **Indicates BUY NOW price. Ebay AFFILIATE LINK Common? ON AMAZON Yes ON EBAY No Easy To Use? SKILL LEVEL EASY OVERVIEW: This the lightweight plastic version of the Ulanzi selfie stick (love the idea and design) but we don't use this for mounting a phone or camera, but instead for mounting a smaller shotgun microphone. MAIN POINTS: PART 1: IS IT PORTABLE? PART 2: IS IT AFFORDABLE? PART 3: IS IT COMMON? PART 4: HOW’S THE QUALITY? PART 5: IS IT EASY TO USE? PART 6: NEEDS ADD-ONS? PART 7: WHERE DO I BUY? PART 1: IS IT PORTABLE? Yes, it's fairly portable, and fits well in the side pocket of the backpack we use. PART 2: IS IT AFFORDABLE? Yes, it's affordable. PART 3: IS IT COMMON? It's common on Amazon, and there are heavier, metal versions that we use for small LED lights, but this one isn't strong enough for a light (or any camera) but works well for a small shotgun microphone. PART 4: HOW’S THE QUALITY? The quality is good enough to mount smaller items, but not for larger, heavier items (such as a camera). PART 5: IS IT EASY TO USE? Yes, it's easy to use, and also fast to set up, and tear down. PART 6: NEEDS ADD-ONS? Yes, when using it to mount a shotgun mic, it works well to add a Movo SMM2 shock mount to it. PART 7: WHERE DO I BUY? I bought this on Amazon. RECOMMENDATION: This works really well as either a short boom pole (to boom from overhead) or as a way to place the mic below the person speaking. These reviews are just my opinion and are focused on my Q.P.A.C.E. packing method, so they're not comprehensive. I wrote these mostly to help me remember what items worked for my KIT PLANS (and which didn't). If I said anything negative I apologize, as these products still may work well for you in your situation, but they were not Q.P.A.C.E (Quality, Portable, Affordable, Common, Easy-to-Use) enough for my budget filmmaking KIT PLANS .

REAL REVIEWS Long-term reviews of budget photo & video gear. KIT PLAN RECOMMENDATION: [NOT IN KIT] Viltrox EF-M2II This image is 100% REAL, and no A.I. (or Photoshop compositing) were used to make it, and I know because I took it myself. Quality? LIGHT USE OK Yes MEDIUM USE OK Yes HEAVY USE OK No Portable? POCKET No CAMERA BAG Yes BACKPACK Yes Affordable? AVERAGE NEW PRICE $ 196 *Indicates SALE price. Amazon AFFILIATE LINK AVERAGE USED PRICE $ 100 **Indicates BUY NOW price. Ebay AFFILIATE LINK Common? ON AMAZON Yes ON EBAY Yes Easy To Use? SKILL LEVEL MEDIUM WARNING: This adapter killed my camera (the Panasonic GX85). The way it happened was I was using the adapter with a Sigma 17-50 2.8 EX, and it first was showing lines on screen, and I completed the shot, and went inside and checked the footage, and the footage had problems too. Then I went out to shoot again, and it started having the problem showing the lines in the screen a couple more times, but a few times later, it did that AND the camera froze (so the power switch would not turn the camera off) so I then took out the battery. Now, the GX85 no longer responds to using the shutter dial, and the only workaround is for me to use the Panasonic Image App to set the shutter speed (and aperture if the lens is electronic). So, it's not working to well to use any more, and it's permanent. Oh, and I never took off the adapter while the camera was on (because I didn't want to get dust on the sensor) so that's not what caused damage. I’ve talked to a couple of other people who had the Viltrox EF-M2ii damage their camera too, so it’s good to be careful, but it might not happen right as soon as you buy it (it took 5 months for mine to have a problem). The lens I was testing at the time was a Sigma 17-50 2.8 EX, and it draws a lot of battery for the old-style autofocus, and that could be part of the issue, but the other people who reported problems with the Viltrox EF-M2ii were using different lenses, so I think the main problem is the adapter wasn’t designed in a partnership with Panasonic, so they didn’t know how to do it right. So, this indicates a problem with this specific combination (the Canon-mount Viltrox EF-M2ii, and Panasonic GX85, with Sigma 17-50 2.8 EX Canon-mount lens) The Panasonic GX85 was a great camera though, and I had used it for several years with no problems up until this point. The problem may be that the company that made this adapter...while they did design it for the Micro Four Thirds lens mount (so it does fit onto the camera) they were (and perhaps still aren’t) part of the Micro Four Thirds group which allows Panasonic (and OM System) to share the technical specifications they would need to design the electronics properly. So, they tried, but they didn’t work with Panasonic to make sure it would work…and the result is it ruined my camera (after a couple of years/hundreds of lens changes) so I’m just trying to warn people, so they don’t lose their camera too. These reviews are just my opinion and are focused on my Q.P.A.C.E. packing method, so they're not comprehensive. I wrote these mostly to help me remember what items worked for my KIT PLANS (and which didn't). If I said anything negative I apologize, as these products still may work well for you in your situation, but they were not Q.P.A.C.E (Quality, Portable, Affordable, Common, Easy-to-Use) enough for my budget filmmaking KIT PLANS .

REAL REVIEWS Long-term reviews of budget photo & video gear. KIT PLAN RECOMMENDATION: ADVANCED KIT Tokina 11-16 2.8 ii This image is 100% REAL, and no A.I. (or Photoshop compositing) were used to make it, and I know because I took it myself. Quality? LIGHT USE OK Yes MEDIUM USE OK Yes HEAVY USE OK Yes Portable? POCKET No CAMERA BAG Yes BACKPACK Yes Affordable? AVERAGE NEW PRICE $ 379.00 *Indicates SALE price. Amazon AFFILIATE LINK AVERAGE USED PRICE $ 150.00** **Indicates BUY NOW price. Ebay AFFILIATE LINK Common? ON AMAZON Yes ON EBAY Yes Easy To Use? SKILL LEVEL MEDIUM OVERVIEW: This is the Tokina 11-16 2.8 ii, a lens that has become VERY popular in the budget filmmaking arena. It's designed for APS-C/Super 35 (1.5x) cropped sensor cameras, but when people figured out they could adapt the lens to M43 (Micro Four Thirds) and even full frame (only at 16mm) it became even more popular. The constant f/2.8 aperture combined with an 11-16mm zoom range are probably why it became popular, but I've been experimenting with another use that is even more exciting (to me): using it with a TILT/SHIFT adapter! MAIN POINTS: PART 1: IS IT PORTABLE? PART 2: IS IT AFFORDABLE? PART 3: IS IT COMMON? PART 4: HOW’S THE QUALITY? PART 5: IS IT EASY TO USE? PART 6: NEEDS ADD-ONS? PART 7: WHERE DO I BUY? PART 1: IS IT PORTABLE? It's heavy and is certainly not as small as some of the native Micro Four Thirds lenses (if that’s how you’re using it…adapted) but it's not super big, so I’d say it's portable. The super wide 11mm focal length requires a 77mm filter thread (which is a big filter) but I think they did a good job keeping this sort of lens pretty small, especially when compared with lenses of a similar focal length that are made for full frame. PART 2: IS IT AFFORDABLE? I think it is if you buy it used, but NEW it's still about $400 US. For a while USED versions were hanging out at around $300 US, but they are now a lot less. PART 3: IS IT COMMON? As I mentioned in the AFFORDABILITY section, it's now pretty easy to find a used one of these. That's great, as it's still a great tool. The reason why it's common on the used market might be due to the fact that a lot of people are moving to an all-autofocus workflow, whereas in the past a lot of people used this (adapted) on Micro Four Thirds, with manual focus. PART 4: HOW’S THE QUALITY? When I comment on lens quality, I should always say that "It depends on the sensor (camera) you're using it with". The reason is, it can be a balancing act to find a lens that is sharp, but not TOO sharp for a specific sensor. For example, some say (and I do agree) that this lens isn't sharp enough for the Panasonic GH4. On the GX85 however, it's almost too sharp (maybe because of the lack of the anti-aliasing/low bypass filter on the GX85?). On the G7 it's pretty sharp, and on the G85 too, and if I get a chance to test it on additional cameras I will have more to say. PART 5: IS IT EASY TO USE? It is pretty easy if you're using it on the native lens mount (not adapted) but I'm going to say it's more of a lens for ADVANCED users, especially if you're adapting it and using it with manual focus. I also use it with a TILT/SHIFT adapter, and that's more of an advanced technique (don't worry, you can learn it though). PART 6: NEEDS ADD-ONS? In the case of using it with a TILT/SHIFT adapter, it does need an "add-on" but it's a good tool without it as well...but I couldn't imagine using it without one now that I've used it. PART 7: WHERE DO I BUY? The best place to buy this lens is on your local used marketplaces, such as Craigslist, Offer up, etc. (in the U.S.). It's more expensive (and rare) new, of course. RECOMMENDATION: I think this lens is super useful, not only because of the constant 2.8 aperture, 11-16mm focal length and super low price (on my local used market) but it's also one of my favorite lenses because you can use it with TILT/SHIFT adapters (on Micro Four Thirds cameras). Using a TILT/SHIFT adapter creates opportunities that just are not possible with REAL tilt/shift lenses, mostly because you can mount ANY (Nikon F/G mount) lens on it, INCLUDING ZOOMS (i.e. variable focal length lenses). Check out my BLOG post for more info on using TILT/SHIFT adapters on Micro Four Thirds, but I'll just say the short story is that provides almost total control over both composition/framing (the SHIFT) and focus (TILT). These reviews are just my opinion and are focused on my Q.P.A.C.E. packing method, so they're not comprehensive. I wrote these mostly to help me remember what items worked for my KIT PLANS (and which didn't). If I said anything negative I apologize, as these products still may work well for you in your situation, but they were not Q.P.A.C.E (Quality, Portable, Affordable, Common, Easy-to-Use) enough for my budget filmmaking KIT PLANS .

REAL REVIEWS Long-term reviews of budget photo & video gear. KIT PLAN RECOMMENDATION: MINIMAL KIT Panasonic G85 This image is 100% REAL, and no A.I. (or Photoshop compositing) were used to make it, and I know because I took it myself. Quality? LIGHT USE OK Yes MEDIUM USE OK Yes HEAVY USE OK ? Portable? POCKET No CAMERA BAG Yes BACKPACK Yes Affordable? AVERAGE NEW PRICE $ 797.99 *Indicates SALE price. Amazon AFFILIATE LINK AVERAGE USED PRICE $ 364.50** **Indicates BUY NOW price. Ebay AFFILIATE LINK Common? ON AMAZON Yes ON EBAY Yes Easy To Use? SKILL LEVEL MEDIUM OVERVIEW: The Panasonic G85 is the first camera I would buy if I was an aspiring (budget) filmmaker, because it has good IBIS (In-Body Image Stabilization) a decent 4K sensor, weather sealing, a flip-around screen (if you do vlogging) and a mic input. The screen is quite accurate (almost as good as the GX85) which I think this is important when you're just getting into filmmaking (it helps one make focus and exposure judgements quickly, without attaching a monitor). MAIN POINTS: PART 1: IS IT PORTABLE? PART 2: IS IT AFFORDABLE? PART 3: IS IT COMMON? PART 4: HOW’S THE QUALITY? PART 5: IS IT EASY TO USE? PART 6: NEEDS ADD-ONS? PART 7: WHERE DO I BUY? PART 1: IS IT PORTABLE? I believe it is, and even though the used price of the GH5 is getting lower, some people think it’s too big (and I think that is one of the reasons the LUMIX G85 is still popular). PART 2: IS IT AFFORDABLE? Yes. Yes. Yes…and I kind of hope it stays that way (on the used market)! I say “I hope” based on watching the GX85 go up in price on the used market, after it became more popular…of course that could be due to the fact Panasonic hinted that it’s cancelling the rangefinder style GX-series. PART 3: IS IT COMMON? Yes (on the used market) and no (on the new market. The good news is that it is a much better deal used, so I’m not too worried about the lack of availability new. PART 4: HOW’S THE QUALITY? I can comment on this part only if in comparison to the other cameras I’ve used (which include the LUMIX GH4, G7, GX85 and FZ1000). Any other comparisons would be only based on watching somebody else’s footage, so I’m not going there. Compared to the GH4, the 4K footage of the G85 is much smoother (less speckles/noise) but less color-accurate, though the GH4 color can be off in CINELIKE D. Compared to the LUMIX G7, the weather-sealed body of the G85 is better, and the G85 IBIS is excellent, but the image of the G85 still lacks in the area of what you might call full-spectrum color, which the G7 actually does better at (even though it tends toward have more vibrant color than the actual scene had!) Compared to the LUMIX GX85, the image is identical, and I say that after testing both bodies with the same 50 lenses I’ve tested (however, this makes the GX85 and G85 a great 2-camera pair)! PART 5: IS IT EASY TO USE? I would say the IBIS (In-Body Image Stabilization) makes this camera one of the easiest cameras to use ON-LOCATION (because you don't need a gimbal or a heavy tripod to stabilize it). The traditional CAMERA form factor might make this something people don't want to rig out, but it can be done (watch Nigel Barros' videos on YouTube) but for around $300-400 US, this camera has a lot going for it. As I mentioned about the GX85, In STUDIO circumstances, this camera (and the GX85) aren't the only options in this price range. I've tested the old GH4 and G7 in the studio and they work great (and Sony has a few non-stabilized cameras that produce a really good image) but ON-LOCATION the IBIS of the G85 and GX85 make them really easy to use (no gimbal is needed, and smaller tripods work well). The IBIS on the G85 and GX85 is so good, there isn't much you can't do with it (including handheld movement). The negatives would be that the sensor isn't too good in low light (an f/1.4 is sometimes needed), and the AF is the old pre-phase detect style (contrast-based) technology. So, if you need good AF (autofocus) you'll have to get a newer, more expensive camera. PART 6: NEEDS ADD-ONS? You could get a cage, but other than that, it doesn't really NEED any add-ons. I used to use a speed booster (from Viltrox) but after I dropped my camera, and it scratched the sensor, I no longer recommend it (the optic of the speed booster protrudes into the lens opening more than OEM lenses, so it hit the stabilized sensor when the camera hit the ground). PART 7: WHERE DO I BUY? It's not a (comparatively) good deal to buy this NEW (on Amazon, etc.) but it can be a REALLY good deal when purchased used. The used prices are actually pretty good from places like KEH.com and UsedPhotoPro.com, and they're often good on Ebay too. The surprise though was that all of the local camera stores in my region (Seattle) have had good prices on this too (they're actually better than the average Ebay prices at times!) Private party deals will vary of course, but I'm starting to see people getting rid of these with some pretty good optics (the 12-35 2.8) for a really good deal. I saw this happen with the GH2 and GH4 a while ago, and it can be a really good deal! RECOMMENDATION: I've tested this camera (with about 50 lenses) and I can say that it is a workhorse. Depending on which lens is used, this camera can output some really good footage (and it's even better with my custom, lens-sensor specific settings LOL!) There are some downsides (the color takes getting used to) but after you work with it a while, this camera is a workhorse, and with the exception of the AF, is pretty easy to use (especially with the IBIS). For the price, I don't know of any better option. These reviews are just my opinion and are focused on my Q.P.A.C.E. packing method, so they're not comprehensive. I wrote these mostly to help me remember what items worked for my KIT PLANS (and which didn't). If I said anything negative I apologize, as these products still may work well for you in your situation, but they were not Q.P.A.C.E (Quality, Portable, Affordable, Common, Easy-to-Use) enough for my budget filmmaking KIT PLANS .

REAL REVIEWS Long-term reviews of budget photo & video gear. KIT PLAN RECOMMENDATION: MINIMAL KIT GoPro HERO7 Black This image is 100% REAL, and no A.I. (or Photoshop compositing) were used to make it, and I know because I took it myself. Quality? LIGHT USE OK Yes MEDIUM USE OK Yes HEAVY USE OK Yes Portable? POCKET Yes CAMERA BAG Yes BACKPACK Yes Affordable? AVERAGE NEW PRICE $ 239.00 *Indicates SALE price. Amazon AFFILIATE LINK AVERAGE USED PRICE $ 99.99** **Indicates BUY NOW price. Ebay AFFILIATE LINK Common? ON AMAZON Yes ON EBAY Yes Easy To Use? SKILL LEVEL EASY OVERVIEW: Putting a GoPro on top of your "real" camera is a really easy way to get a #2 shot... MAIN POINTS: PART 1: IS IT PORTABLE? PART 2: IS IT AFFORDABLE? PART 3: IS IT COMMON? PART 4: HOW’S THE QUALITY? PART 5: IS IT EASY TO USE? PART 6: NEEDS ADD-ONS? PART 7: WHERE DO I BUY? PART 1: IS IT PORTABLE? Yes, it's portable (it's a GoPro)! PART 2: IS IT AFFORDABLE? This version (HERO7 Black) seems to be overpriced, on both new and used markets, but that could change. PART 3: IS IT COMMON? The HERO7 Black doesn't seem as common (especially compared to the HERO8) but that's probably a good thing, and I recommend getting the HERO8 instead anyway. PART 4: HOW’S THE QUALITY? Regarding the image & video quality, the image on the HERO4 Silver is better...but the HERO4 is really good (for some reason). My theory is that the NOISE REDUCTION on the HERO7 Black is too aggressive. I've tried to fix it by setting the ISO MIN. and MAX to the same thing (ISO 200) and what I've been finding with this camera is that it seems to create the most non-processed image. One reason is it seems to keep the auto exposure (which is a combination of auto ISO and auto SHUTTER) from changing too abruptly, and this looks more smooth and natural. Also, I only use 2.7K on this camera (not 4K) so I can both shoot using the "Linear" FOV (Field of View) mode, and because shooting in 2.7K allows using "HyperSmooth" stabilization, which is essential, in my opinion. PART 5: IS IT EASY TO USE? It is and is not easy to use, but mostly because I lock the ISO at 200 (but that doesn't always work well in low light situations). Also, if you want good stabilization, you can only use 2.7K (not 4K) so that's another thing to remember...that makes this version not as easy to use (get the HERO8 Black). PART 6: NEEDS ADD-ONS? Yes, the HERO7 Black needs an OEM mounting frame (because it wasn't until the 8 they were built into the body). PART 7: WHERE DO I BUY? I bought mine used, on OfferUp. RECOMMENDATION: I don't think the HERO7 Black is worth buying, because for the price you can get a HERO8 Black which doesn't have a soft image like the HERO7 Black. These reviews are just my opinion and are focused on my Q.P.A.C.E. packing method, so they're not comprehensive. I wrote these mostly to help me remember what items worked for my KIT PLANS (and which didn't). If I said anything negative I apologize, as these products still may work well for you in your situation, but they were not Q.P.A.C.E (Quality, Portable, Affordable, Common, Easy-to-Use) enough for my budget filmmaking KIT PLANS .

REAL REVIEWS Long-term reviews of budget photo & video gear. KIT PLAN RECOMMENDATION: BASIC KIT Panasonic GX85 This image is 100% REAL, and no A.I. (or Photoshop compositing) were used to make it, and I know because I took it myself. Quality? LIGHT USE OK Yes MEDIUM USE OK Yes HEAVY USE OK No Portable? POCKET No CAMERA BAG Yes BACKPACK Yes Affordable? AVERAGE NEW PRICE $ 1,067.28 *Indicates SALE price. Amazon AFFILIATE LINK AVERAGE USED PRICE $ 462.49** **Indicates BUY NOW price. Ebay AFFILIATE LINK Common? ON AMAZON Yes ON EBAY Yes Easy To Use? SKILL LEVEL MEDIUM OVERVIEW: This is the Panasonic GX85, formerly one of the most underrated 4K cameras out there. I think it has one of the best IBIS systems available to date (even better than the GH5) probably because of the substantial weight of this little camera. It's got a small (2x crop) Micro Four Thirds sensor, but after testing it with over 50 lenses (mostly adapted vintage lenses) I can say it's capable of outputting pretty good 4K video (especially with my custom "lens-sensor specific" camera settings). This camera is a great budget filmmaking option and it's currently my preferred #2 camera (the G85 being my primary, because this one doesn't have a microphone jack). The image from the GX85 matches the Panasonic G85 perfectly, so the settings I use are almost always the same (this makes sense to me, because it uses the same sensor, with possibly slightly different image processing). The screen on this camera is one of the most accurate I've ever used, and it's good enough to make focus, exposure and even color judgements. The GX85 is VERY useful as an architectural (perspective control) camera because the rangefinder style design allows it to use a tilt/shift adapter (Nikon to M4/3) whereas the G7, G85 and G95 bodies cannot (due to the pop-up flash over the lens mount). MAIN POINTS: PART 1: IS IT PORTABLE? PART 2: IS IT AFFORDABLE? PART 3: IS IT COMMON? PART 4: HOW’S THE QUALITY? PART 5: IS IT EASY TO USE? PART 6: NEEDS ADD-ONS? PART 7: WHERE DO I BUY? PART 1: IS IT PORTABLE? It's small, but it's heavier than you'd expect. I think this does help the IBIS work better, but some people (MarkusPix) wish it were lighter. It's also portable in the sense of charging, because the battery can be charged using the Micro SD port...so you don't need to carry a charger (even though I do, as well as a couple extra batteries, because they don't last too long). I do run it from a power bank on longer shoots but remember to put it in "Silent Mode" if you do this (because some of the 5v to 9v upconverter cables don't always provide enough power). PART 2: IS IT AFFORDABLE? Yes. Almost all of the gear I am experimenting with is affordable, but this camera is especially affordable when buying it used (body only) though It can be a good deal when you buy it new as well, when it only comes in a kit with 2 lenses. The problem (for me) is I almost never use these two kit lenses for video (the 12-32, which has no manual focus option, and the 45-150 which only works well OUTDOORS because of the 5.6 maximum aperture). For my OUTDOOR TELE work, I almost always use a 1990s vintage Nikon-mount 70-300 lens anyway because of both the price ($30-$80 US) and the longer focal length. I don't use the AF on this camera, so I don't really mind using manual focus on adapted lenses like that one. The point is, the GX85 two-lens kit can be a really good deal new, but I don't need those two kit lenses, but you can sell them off and buy something else with the funds. PART 3: IS IT COMMON? This is a difficult question for me to answer, but I'll start by saying it's a lot more common (on the used market) than the GX9 (which is becoming pretty rare). The good news is the GX85 kit has been on sale almost every year (around Christmas) and so I'm guessing a lot of units have been sold, but it seems to be harder to find now than it was before...may be due to the fact that we've been told this type of camera is being discontinued by Panasonic. It's certainly not too late to find a used GX85 though (as of the time of this review) but the prices are going up, and it's becoming more of a collector's item than a bargain camera at this point. PART 4: HOW’S THE QUALITY? I've tested the GX85 right alongside the G85, and the quality of the output is identical (if you compare shooting in the NATURAL profile). The GX85 lacks a mic input jack, weather sealing and CINELIKE D, but I actually prefer the NATURAL picture profile, so I consider the GX85 the perfect 2nd camera to go with the G85. The 4K output on the GX85 (and G85) is pretty good (especially with my CUSTOM SETTINGS) and the IBIS is super good on both of them as well (but actually better on the GX85 in my opinion, probably because of the weight/balancing of the camera). PART 5: IS IT EASY TO USE? I would say the GX85 is an INTERMEDIATE level camera, as far as ease of use goes. It's not super easy to grip, and the AF isn't that good, but I use it on a dual-camera cage and use either touchscreen assisted focus or manual focus, so the old contrast-based AF is not a problem for me (it is slower as far as workflow is concerned though). In STUDIO circumstances, this camera isn’t the only option in this price range (I've tested the old GH4 and G7 in the studio too, and they work well). ON-LOCATION however, the IBIS of this GX85 makes it very easy to use (as no gimbal is needed, and smaller tripods also work well). I often say that my camera recommendations depend on the type of shots you're trying to get (static or moving) but because the IBIS on the GX85 is so good, there's not really much you can't do with it (including handheld stuff). The form factor of the camera doesn't work for everyone, and there are some negatives in certain scenarios (like you can't really do vlogging with it as the screen doesn't flip OUT) but overall I think it's a really good tool. Yes, the AF is the old pre-phase detect style (contrast-based) but my workflows have always been to use manual focus anyway, so I don't really mind. If you need AF, you'll need to get get one of the newer cameras though (S5ii, S5iix, G9ii, GH7, etc.) PART 6: NEEDS ADD-ONS? Yes. I almost always shoot using a dummy battery and a power bank (and you MUST use only the electronic shutter with the adapters I have). That means the battery it comes with doesn't last that long of course, but with the power bank I have had the camera run for over 2 hours without a problem (and there's not a record limit, so that is good!) PART 7: WHERE DO I BUY? You used to be able to find it new as a kit (with the 12-32 and 45-150 lenses) for a pretty good deal (and it would go on sale before Christmas)...but now it's getting hard to find it new because Panasonic said they were going to discontinue this line. Then, regarding buying it used, the story has also changed (of course). It was available (used) for around $300 US when I bought it, but the price has gone up to around $500. RECOMMENDATION: If I only had 2 cameras, this would be one of them. Notice I didn't say only ONE as I always shoot with (at least) 2 cameras...but this thing is so versatile, it would be one of the first cameras I would buy, and it matches the G85 sensor output almost perfectly, so those would be the first two budget filmmaking cameras I would buy. There's so much to say about what this camera can do, and I know my approach of using it with a TILT/SHIFT adapter isn't necessarily popular, but I think it's one of the best reasons to buy this camera (at the price point it's available for). These reviews are just my opinion and are focused on my Q.P.A.C.E. packing method, so they're not comprehensive. I wrote these mostly to help me remember what items worked for my KIT PLANS (and which didn't). If I said anything negative I apologize, as these products still may work well for you in your situation, but they were not Q.P.A.C.E (Quality, Portable, Affordable, Common, Easy-to-Use) enough for my budget filmmaking KIT PLANS .

REAL REVIEWS Long-term reviews of budget photo & video gear. KIT PLAN RECOMMENDATION: [NOT IN KIT] Panasonic G7 This image is 100% REAL, and no A.I. (or Photoshop compositing) were used to make it, and I know because I took it myself. Quality? LIGHT USE OK Yes MEDIUM USE OK Yes HEAVY USE OK No Portable? POCKET No CAMERA BAG No BACKPACK Yes Affordable? AVERAGE NEW PRICE $ 547.99* *Indicates SALE price. Amazon AFFILIATE LINK AVERAGE USED PRICE $ 317.32** **Indicates BUY NOW price. Ebay AFFILIATE LINK Common? ON AMAZON Yes ON EBAY Yes Easy To Use? SKILL LEVEL MEDIUM OVERVIEW: This camera is good for leaving in the studio, but I don't like using it in the field. The lack of IBIS (In-Body Image Stabilization) means you need a larger, heavier tripod (or gimbal) to use it effectively. Also, the inaccurate screen isn't a good tool for beginners who need to make exposure and other image judgements using it (instead of an external monitor). The GX85 and G85 screens are much better (but the GH4 screen is even worse than the G7). MAIN POINTS: PART 1: IS IT PORTABLE? PART 2: IS IT AFFORDABLE? PART 3: IS IT COMMON? PART 4: HOW’S THE QUALITY? PART 5: IS IT EASY TO USE? PART 6: NEEDS ADD-ONS? PART 7: WHERE DO I BUY? PART 1: IS IT PORTABLE? The camera itself is small and light weight, but if you’re using it for video, the lack of IBIS (In-Body Image Stabilization) means you’ll need to add a gimbal, and that’s why I say it doesn’t fit in a camera bag (or your pocket) but will require using a backpack to transport it. If you’re using it for STILL photography, you might be okay (if you follow the focal length/shutter speed rule) but for video, even if you do a lot of static shots (using a tripod) I’ve found the tripod needs to be pretty sturdy (and/or be carbon fiber) to make sure the shake doesn’t show up in shots (especially if it’s windy). These are the reasons I say it’s a good camera to leave in the studio…but it produces such a nice image it may be worth carrying around, even with the gimbal (and heavier tripod) added to your pack. PART 2: IS IT AFFORDABLE? Yes. The Panasonic G7 is one of the most affordable, good cameras out there. It's usually around $300 (used) and if you don't need IBIS (In-Body Image Stabilization) you can go wrong with it (unless you do a lot of low light/ambient light work). PART 3: IS IT COMMON? Yes... it seems like it's everywhere (but that's a good thing). I have purchased the G7 either for testing purposes or for a shoot, 3 times so far, and each time I sold it I said to myself "I need the money for something else now, but I know I can always get another one later". PART 4: HOW’S THE QUALITY? There's a lot to say here. Here's my SHORT version: Do NOT export (from Davinci Resolve) using any compression. Only use h.264 Master. THEN upload to YouTube. If you add any sort of compression (i.e. the "YouTube preset" or other presets) the footage from the G7 FALLS APART. It's really bad...but remember, it is pretty good if you use. h.264 Master (so don't give up on it). Having said all of that, I like the image (the color science, and everything) of the G7 better than the GH4, GX85 and GX85 (the competition in that price range). The only reason I keep selling the G7 is the lack of IBIS...but I may decide to put up with that and buy it again. PART 5: IS IT EASY TO USE? So, I have to bring up the lack of IBIS again. The camera size and controls make it pretty easy to use, but having no "In-Body Image Stabilization" makes it a LOT more cumbersome to transport and use for video, because you need a gimbal and/or a heavier weight tripod (or a Steadicam vest and arm). So, for STUDIO work I consider it easy-to-use, but for ON-LOCATION work, it's somewhat of a bother...and that's why I don't use the G7 for that. PART 6: NEEDS ADD-ONS? Yes, it needs a gimbal...or a very sturdy tripod (due to lack of IBIS). For static (non-moving) shots, you can sometimes wait for the shake to die down, but in certain scenarios (windy conditions, etc.) it won't work, unless you have a really heavyweight tripod...or are moving around on a gimbal. PART 7: WHERE DO I BUY? I've found the G7 is overpriced NEW (even though it is a good camera) but it's a really good deal on the USED market (eBay, Offer up, Craigslist, etc.) RECOMMENDATION: I really don't know what to do about the G7. I really like the image that it can produce (especially with my custom "Lens-Sensor Specific" settings) but I keep coming back to the lack of IBIS. Not having In-Body Image Stabilization makes it take longer to get good footage in the field because you either have to carry, and set up, a gimbal...or use a heavy tripod (if you use a lighter tripod, you CAN wait a bit for the shake to die down, but in windy areas that's not always a solution). So, I'm not completely sure what to do but I will say, the image it produces is so good, I keep coming back. These reviews are just my opinion and are focused on my Q.P.A.C.E. packing method, so they're not comprehensive. I wrote these mostly to help me remember what items worked for my KIT PLANS (and which didn't). If I said anything negative I apologize, as these products still may work well for you in your situation, but they were not Q.P.A.C.E (Quality, Portable, Affordable, Common, Easy-to-Use) enough for my budget filmmaking KIT PLANS .

REAL REVIEWS Long-term reviews of budget photo & video gear. KIT PLAN RECOMMENDATION: MINIMAL KIT GoPro HERO4 Silver This image is 100% REAL, and no A.I. (or Photoshop compositing) were used to make it, and I know because I took it myself. Quality? LIGHT USE OK Yes MEDIUM USE OK Yes HEAVY USE OK Yes Portable? POCKET Yes CAMERA BAG Yes BACKPACK Yes Affordable? AVERAGE NEW PRICE NA *Indicates SALE price. Amazon AFFILIATE LINK AVERAGE USED PRICE $ 50.34** **Indicates BUY NOW price. Ebay AFFILIATE LINK Common? ON AMAZON Yes ON EBAY Yes Easy To Use? SKILL LEVEL EASY OVERVIEW: If you don't need image stabilization (which you don't need as much when it's mounted to the top of your bigger camera) the HERO4 Silver is a really good deal ($40 used). I don't know why footage from this old and inexpensive camera looks so good. I think it could be due to the lack of excessive NR (Noise Reduction) that some of the newer models I've tested have (especially the HERO7). Also, sometimes you might want a bit of camera movement (I.C.M) and for those times this can work really well for that. I keep 2 of these around to use either on the cold shoe of my camera (the "Minimal Kit") or as BTS (behind the scenes) camera, mounted on a small selfie stick/tripod (or a GorillaPod) on the floor. Keep in mind that this one is not waterproof (at all) (without the enclosure) so try to buy one with that underwater housing included. MAIN POINTS: PART 1: IS IT PORTABLE? PART 2: IS IT AFFORDABLE? PART 3: IS IT COMMON? PART 4: HOW’S THE QUALITY? PART 5: IS IT EASY TO USE? PART 6: NEEDS ADD-ONS? PART 7: WHERE DO I BUY? PART 1: IS IT PORTABLE? Yes, it is super tiny. It would not only fit in a small pants pocket but two or three of them would! I usually store one of them, with a cold shoe adapter, in every camera bag I have (even in the mini one of my "Minimal Kit"). PART 2: IS IT AFFORDABLE? Yes. On the used market it's around $40 US, and it's so old you won't find many on the NEW market, and if you do they'll probably be overpriced (for collectors to buy). PART 3: IS IT COMMON? Yes, it is pretty common (there are lots of them out there) which likely indicates it sold well when it was the current model, probably because it just works good, and it was a big step up from the previous version. PART 4: HOW’S THE QUALITY? I have had people comment on how good the quality was (when the footage was edited alongside the Panasonic GX85) so I think it's pretty good. I think I only use it in 2.7K mode (I think that's all that's available in the "Linear" lens angle mode) but it does a good job. PART 5: IS IT EASY TO USE? I think so, if all you do is press record. The custom settings are kind of limited though, so you'll have to spend some time finishing the image in post-production. Make sure to use my CUSTOM SETTINGS to get the image to a good starting point though as you don't want to start with an image that crushes the blacks (or blows out highlights) so check out the custom settings for it (on my website, shameless plug). PART 6: NEEDS ADD-ONS? Yes. You need the waterproof housing (not only for the waterproofing but also for the mounting posts) and I like to add a camera mount as well. You can get 3rd party waterproof housings for it, but because it goes over the lens, I would think the OEM GoPro version would be less destructive (optically). Plus, the custom camera settings (on my website) are based on using the OEM GoPro housing (as it does affect the image quality somewhat). PART 7: WHERE DO I BUY? I've purchased two of them on local marketplaces (Offer up, Craigslist) because the price has been good. If you try to find them on Amazon, they are likely to be overpriced, but eBay would probably be a good option. RECOMMENDATION: If you don't have a #2 camera, and you have an extra $40, I think the GoPro HERO4 Silver is a good camera to get (do NOT get the HERO4 Black though, as it only shoots in fisheye modes, not in the Linear mode). Even if you do shoot with two cameras already, it can be fun to add some behind-the-scenes (BTS) footage with one of these. Keep in mind that some of these action cameras will stop recording after about 10 minutes, so it's not a replacement for a REAL 2nd camera. These reviews are just my opinion and are focused on my Q.P.A.C.E. packing method, so they're not comprehensive. I wrote these mostly to help me remember what items worked for my KIT PLANS (and which didn't). If I said anything negative I apologize, as these products still may work well for you in your situation, but they were not Q.P.A.C.E (Quality, Portable, Affordable, Common, Easy-to-Use) enough for my budget filmmaking KIT PLANS .

REAL REVIEWS Long-term reviews of budget photo & video gear. KIT PLAN RECOMMENDATION: ADVANCED KIT Panasonic FZ1000 This image is 100% REAL, and no A.I. (or Photoshop compositing) were used to make it, and I know because I took it myself. Quality? LIGHT USE OK Yes MEDIUM USE OK Yes HEAVY USE OK ? Portable? POCKET No CAMERA BAG Yes BACKPACK Yes Affordable? AVERAGE NEW PRICE $ 999.00 *Indicates SALE price. Amazon AFFILIATE LINK AVERAGE USED PRICE $ 359.95** **Indicates BUY NOW price. Ebay AFFILIATE LINK Common? ON AMAZON No ON EBAY Yes Easy To Use? SKILL LEVEL EASY OVERVIEW: I'm pretty close to being convinced that the FZ1000 is a legit budget filmmaking tool. After years of testing, I've figured out how to make the camera produce a professional "non-digital" looking image by (using my custom camera settings which you can find on my website). I use the FZ1000 as a #3 camera, mostly for TELE shots, and in a certain way I would buy this camera before I’d buy an expensive telephoto lens, because it can do the same thing (with sufficient light). It isn't very good in LOW LIGHT however, so I only say this if you’re mostly using it OUTDOORS...but it’s not weather-sealed, so you'll have to cover it in bad weather. MAIN POINTS: PART 1: IS IT PORTABLE? PART 2: IS IT AFFORDABLE? PART 3: IS IT COMMON? PART 4: HOW’S THE QUALITY? PART 5: IS IT EASY TO USE? PART 1: IS IT PORTABLE? The funny thing is, this camera has a smaller sensor than Micro Four Thirds cameras, but it’s bigger than most of the M43 cameras I use (especially the GX85 and G85). The reason is, it has a built-in lens with a really long WIDE to TELE zoom range (25-400mm). There is no Micro Four Thirds lens that can be competitive to it, but if there were the size of it may make the comparison null. So the FZ1000 is a little big, but overall it's still small for what it does, especially compared to actual video cameras, which the FZ1000 is more similar to (than M43) in what it can do (with the motorized zoom and all). PART 2: IS IT AFFORDABLE? I've seen the FZ1000 on the used market for around $500 consistently, but there are times when all I can find is one around $300. I think it's worth that $500 (because of what this camera can do) but I try to get them for around $300 if I can. Just make sure they're in good condition. There is an FZ1000 version 2, and while it is less common on the used market, it can also be available for around $500, which is a really good deal (for what you're getting). PART 3: IS IT COMMON? I think version 1 is more common than version 2 (on the USED market) for sure, but compared to other budget Panasonic cameras (like the G7) that are almost everywhere, the FZ1000 is a little bit harder to find in my area. PART 4: HOW’S THE QUALITY? First I'll give an important update about my concern regarding the FZ1000 not being good in low light situations: I updated my custom “lens-sensor specific” settings and I think now it’s doing much better in low light. I still only go up to ISO 800 though, as you have to be careful to not go above that, or you'll get the problems the small sensor produces (increased grain, noise and/or the look of too much noise reduction). The custom settings I'm using are also doing a really good job insomuch as they allow me to set the exposure lower due (to the lower CONTRAST, and Highlight Shadow curve) which essentially lets me get an extra stop of light...These are just tweaks to the Natural "Photo Style" but they really work! Let's talk more about the "small" 1-inch sensor. I know there are many professional (and more expensive) video cameras/camcorders that have a 1-inch sensor a well, a lot of which are considered professional tools. So, the 1-inch sensor in the FZ1000 isn't a deal-breaker in some scenarios. So, after testing the FZ1000 (for over 2 years) I'm excited to say that I've found its lens, sensor and processing team to be quite capable. The lens is really good at all focal lengths, even though it isn't an interchangeable lens (and even though it doesn't have that constant f/2.8 aperture of its smaller-sensor sibling, the Panasonic FZ300). I used to believe that having a non-interchangeable lens was a bad idea, but after doing hundreds of lens-sensor tests (and changing lenses more times than I felt was safe) I'm starting to appreciate the value of having a camera with a good lens, that DOESN'T come off. Another thing to note about the camera is that it really needs an ND filter when used OUTDOORS...but (for some optical reason) it doesn't work with a VND (variable ND). It's interesting and somewhat distressing, but at the longer telephoto focal lengths a VND filter makes the image look so bad, you would have to try it yourself to believe it! It's even more interesting that a similar thing happens with a lot of the 70-300 lenses I've tested (also at and near the long end of the zoom range). My theory is it has something to do with the enormous amount of space between the optics when the lens is in the extended telephoto position. The solution I've found is to use a straight ND filter, and ND8 has been the best strength. My last concern I had about the FZ1000 in terms of being a full-featured, useful camera is that it’s not good for macro (it doesn’t focus close except at wide angle). The solution, I've been told (haven't tested this yet) is to attach a Raynox DCR-150 Snap-On Macro Lens. I've seen great pictures made with this combo, and the close-up attachment is less than $100 US (sometimes less). So, I may need to confirm this, as I consider macro to be an essential part of photography and video (at least for me) so I'm glad this solution exists. PART 5: IS IT EASY TO USE? It’s easy to use after a bit of practice, so I’d rate it as INTERMEDIATE in terms of ease of use. The CONTINUOUS autofocus isn’t that good, and there isn’t a touchscreen that makes picking the focus point easy (like the FZ1000 ii and the FZ2500) but the SINGLE SHOT AF is good enough, and having a lens with a WIDE to TELE zoom range saves a lot of time, so I do think it’s pretty easy to use. RECOMMENDATION: I think the FZ1000 is a really useful tool in the role of a #3 camera (especially OUTDOORS). The reason is that it has a wide zoom range (from WIDE to TELE) which you can use to quickly set up a #3 shot, without much fuss. I wouldn't say the FZ1000 would be good as a main (A-camera) but it's still one of the best cameras for the price, if you know it's limitations. These reviews are just my opinion and are focused on my Q.P.A.C.E. packing method, so they're not comprehensive. I wrote these mostly to help me remember what items worked for my KIT PLANS (and which didn't). If I said anything negative I apologize, as these products still may work well for you in your situation, but they were not Q.P.A.C.E (Quality, Portable, Affordable, Common, Easy-to-Use) enough for my budget filmmaking KIT PLANS .

REAL REVIEWS Long-term reviews of budget photo & video gear. KIT PLAN RECOMMENDATION: BASIC KIT TAVT EN-EL15 Batteries (for Nikon) & PD20W Fast Charger This image is 100% REAL, and no A.I. (or Photoshop compositing) were used to make it, and I know because I took it myself. Quality? LIGHT USE OK Yes MEDIUM USE OK Yes HEAVY USE OK ? Portable? POCKET Yes CAMERA BAG Yes BACKPACK Yes Affordable? AVERAGE NEW PRICE $30 *Indicates SALE price. Amazon AFFILIATE LINK AVERAGE USED PRICE ? **Indicates BUY NOW price. Ebay AFFILIATE LINK Common? ON AMAZON Yes ON EBAY No Easy To Use? SKILL LEVEL EASY OVERVIEW: This is a set of 2 batteries (yes, for a Nikon camera body) and a case that both protects the batteries during transport and charges the batteries (when plugged in using a USB-C PD cable). It also has 2 card slots, for normal SD cards. MAIN POINTS: PART 1: IS IT PORTABLE? PART 2: IS IT AFFORDABLE? PART 3: IS IT COMMON? PART 4: HOW’S THE QUALITY? PART 5: IS IT EASY TO USE? PART 6: NEEDS ADD-ONS? PART 7: WHERE DO I BUY? PART 1: IS IT PORTABLE? Yes, it's definitely portable, and that's part of why I think it's such a great idea (because the case protects the batteries). PART 2: IS IT AFFORDABLE? Yes, I would say it's an average price for a set of 2 batteries and a charger, but I think the design is so good (that it is both a case and a charger, and how the batteries lay flat as they charge) that it's worth more than others. PART 3: IS IT COMMON? It's common on Amazon, but probably not on the used market. PART 4: HOW’S THE QUALITY? I need to test these for a longer time (and in more situations) to be able to compare their quality, but the design, and build of the case is good. PART 5: IS IT EASY TO USE? Yes, it's easy to use, and I think these work better than chargers where the batteries are standing up on one end (those tend to make the batteries prone to not seating correctly, which might be bad if there is electrical arc-ing). PART 6: NEEDS ADD-ONS? It doesn't really need any add-ons. PART 7: WHERE DO I BUY? I purchased this on Amazon. RECOMMENDATION: My conclusion is, this is the best design for a battery case & charger I have ever come across, and I wish this was available for Panasonic batteries too. If I keep the Nikon camera, I'll probably keep this charger too. These reviews are just my opinion and are focused on my Q.P.A.C.E. packing method, so they're not comprehensive. I wrote these mostly to help me remember what items worked for my KIT PLANS (and which didn't). If I said anything negative I apologize, as these products still may work well for you in your situation, but they were not Q.P.A.C.E (Quality, Portable, Affordable, Common, Easy-to-Use) enough for my budget filmmaking KIT PLANS .

REAL REVIEWS Long-term reviews of budget photo & video gear. KIT PLAN RECOMMENDATION: [NOT IN KIT] Viltrox NF-M43X This image is 100% REAL, and no A.I. (or Photoshop compositing) were used to make it, and I know because I took it myself. Quality? LIGHT USE OK Yes MEDIUM USE OK Yes HEAVY USE OK ? Portable? POCKET No CAMERA BAG Yes BACKPACK Yes Affordable? AVERAGE NEW PRICE $ 79.50 *Indicates SALE price. Amazon AFFILIATE LINK AVERAGE USED PRICE ? **Indicates BUY NOW price. Ebay AFFILIATE LINK Common? ON AMAZON Yes ON EBAY Yes Easy To Use? SKILL LEVEL DIFFICULT OVERVIEW: This used to be my favorite (budget) speed booster, but I learned that if your camera has IBIS (In-Body Image Stabilization) it can damage the sensor IF YOU DROP THE CAMERA! MAIN POINTS: PART 1: IS IT PORTABLE? PART 2: IS IT AFFORDABLE? PART 3: IS IT COMMON? PART 4: HOW’S THE QUALITY? PART 5: IS IT EASY TO USE? PART 6: NEEDS ADD-ONS? PART 7: WHERE DO I BUY? PART 1: IS IT PORTABLE? PART 2: IS IT AFFORDABLE? PART 3: IS IT COMMON? PART 4: HOW’S THE QUALITY? PART 5: IS IT EASY TO USE? PART 6: NEEDS ADD-ONS? PART 7: WHERE DO I BUY? RECOMMENDATION: These reviews are just my opinion and are focused on my Q.P.A.C.E. packing method, so they're not comprehensive. I wrote these mostly to help me remember what items worked for my KIT PLANS (and which didn't). If I said anything negative I apologize, as these products still may work well for you in your situation, but they were not Q.P.A.C.E (Quality, Portable, Affordable, Common, Easy-to-Use) enough for my budget filmmaking KIT PLANS .